Why literacy.

The Understanding Company makes tools that explain how health, time and money are related. Our research asks why Black Americans hold less wealth and live shorter lives than White Americans. In 2025 the median non-Hispanic White family held $332,100 in net worth and the median non-Hispanic Black family $36,800.1 In 2024, life expectancy at birth was 74.8 years for non-Hispanic Black Americans and 78.9 for non-Hispanic White Americans.1

Every tool we build assumes something simple: that the person using it can read what it says.

Reading is getting harder for more people.

  • 28%

    of working-age American adults scored at Level 1 or below in literacy in 2023, up from 19% in 2017.2

  • 40%

    of fourth graders read below the NAEP Basic level in 2024, the largest share since 2002.3

  • 33%

    of eighth graders read below NAEP Basic in 2024, the largest share NAEP has recorded.3

The average adult literacy score fell from 271 in 2017 to 258 in 2023, not significantly different from the international average of 260.2

The gaps follow race and income.

Share reading below NAEP Basic, 2024. Computed from the NAEP Data Service.4
StudentsGrade 4Grade 8
White students30%23%
Black students56%48%
Hispanic students52%45%
Economically disadvantaged53%46%
Not economically disadvantaged26%22%

A history of being kept from reading.

  1. 1830

    North Carolina made it illegal for any free person to teach an enslaved person to read or write, “the use of figures excepted”. Its preamble said such teaching had “a tendency to excite dissatisfaction in their minds”.5

  2. 1831

    In April 1831, months before Nat Turner’s revolt, Virginia made any meeting to teach free Black people reading or writing an unlawful assembly.6

  3. 1845

    Frederick Douglass wrote of overhearing that learning to read “would forever unfit him to be a slave”, and of what he took from it: “I understood the pathway from slavery to freedom.”7

  4. 1870

    The census recorded 79.9% of Black Americans and Americans of other races aged 14 and over as unable to read or write in any language. By 1900 the share was 44.5%.8

  5. 1959

    The Supreme Court held that North Carolina’s literacy test for voters was not unconstitutional on its face.9

  6. 1965

    The Voting Rights Act suspended literacy tests in the places it covered.9

  7. 1970

    Congress banned literacy tests for voting nationwide until 1975, and the Supreme Court upheld the ban.9

  8. 1975

    Congress made the ban permanent.9

“I understood the pathway from slavery to freedom.”

Frederick Douglass, 1845

Literacy and money.

Skills go with pay: in the United States, one standard deviation more numeracy goes with 28% higher wages, the largest return of the countries studied.10 Children who grow up with 500 books at home, rather than few or none, go on to 3.2 more years of schooling, across 27 nations.11 Both are associations, not measured effects.

Financial knowledge explains part of it

  • In a life-cycle model, financial knowledge accounts for 30 to 40% of the inequality in retirement wealth. The model does not look at race.12
  • On one survey of financial knowledge, Black adults answered 38% of the questions correctly and White adults 55%.13

Knowledge does not explain the racial wealth gap

  • William Darity Jr., Darrick Hamilton and their coauthors call the idea that financial literacy will close the racial wealth gap a myth: “Financial literacy without finance is meaningless.”14 Knowledge, they argue, cannot stand in for wealth.
  • On average, they find, a Black household headed by a college graduate has less wealth than a White household whose head did not finish high school.14
  • Differences in earnings explain about two thirds of the Black–White gap in mean wealth.15

Our own paper, Years and Dollars, takes the second view. Of the wealth gap it says: “Differences in education, saving rates, or financial literacy account for little of it.”1 We do not think a library closes that gap, and we do not claim it.

Read the paper

Where the name comes from.

Linking Literature is a Detroit organization. From 2015 it gave books to children and, until 2019, posted new writing at linkingliterature.org. It gives its mission as “to be a common ground that will link the world through literature and expression.”16

It ran #LinkingLiterature1Million, a book drive on social media: people posted a picture of themselves giving a child a book, toward a goal of a million books for a million children. In 2015 and 2016 it held a Youth Literature Collection in Detroit, with books for every grade from kindergarten to 12th; in 2017, a Back-to-School Drive. In 2017, it says, over 1,000 books went to Detroit children, and over 200 children got backpacks and school supplies.16

Its About Us page, first posted in 2016, says it has put over 11,000 books in the hands of over 2,500 children. It says it has also given books to children in Indiana, Georgia, Ohio and Liberia, and that it had an audience in 106 countries.16 We have not checked these figures.

It also published poems and essays by aspiring writers of all ages. Steven Farrar, now The Understanding Company’s CFO, was its editor-in-chief and the first of its featured writers.

So why a library.

This library carries the name on. A book costs nothing to open, and the library asks for no account and no score. It is a free library of 59,532 books, ten pages at a time: public-domain books, and now the poems and essays first posted on linkingliterature.org, each linked to the original and under its writer’s name where the post gives one.

It is a library, not a course or a test: we have not measured whether it changes how anyone reads, and we make no claim that it does.

Start with ten pages.

Open the library
Notes
  1. Note 1: Kirk and Farrar, Years and Dollars, version 2.2, October 2026, a working paper that is not peer reviewed (theunderstanding.company/research/years-and-dollars). Net worth: Federal Reserve, 2025 Survey of Consumer Finances, median family net worth of non-Hispanic families, 2025 dollars. Life expectancy: National Center for Health Statistics, United States Life Tables, 2024, non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White populations.

  2. Note 2: Adult literacy: National Center for Education Statistics, Highlights of the 2023 U.S. PIAAC Results (NCES 2024-202), December 2024, https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/piaac/2023/national_results.asp, and the Institute of Education Sciences press release of December 10, 2024. The survey covers working-age adults. The 2023 test was given entirely on tablets, and NCES says comparisons with 2017 “need to be made with caution”.

  3. Note 3: Children’s reading: The Nation’s Report Card, 2024 Reading, grades 4 and 8 (NCES 2024-218), https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reports/reading/2024/g4_8/, and the National Assessment Governing Board’s release of January 29, 2025. The 2024 grade 4 average and below-Basic share are not significantly different from 1992. NAEP Basic and Proficient are NAEP’s own achievement levels, not grade levels.

  4. Note 4: Reading by group: computed by The Understanding Company from the NAEP Data Service (2024 reading, grades 4 and 8, national), queried October 29, 2026, and rounded to whole percentages, https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/DataService/. “Economically disadvantaged” is NAEP’s own category from 2024; it replaced eligibility for the National School Lunch Program.

  5. Note 5: North Carolina, A Bill to Prevent All Persons from Teaching Slaves to Read or Write, the Use of Figures Excepted (1830), in Acts Passed by the General Assembly of the State of North Carolina, 1830–1831. Transcription: https://www.ncanchor.org/anchor/primary-source-bill-prevent

  6. Note 6: Encyclopedia Virginia, “Slave Literacy and Education in Virginia”, https://encyclopediavirginia.org/entries/slave-literacy-and-education-in-virginia/. Virginia law never banned the education of enslaved people outright: an 1819 law barred them from schools that taught reading or writing, and the act of April 7, 1831 made such meetings an unlawful assembly.

  7. Note 7: Frederick Douglass, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave (Boston: Anti-Slavery Office, 1845), chapter VI. Douglass overheard Mr. Auld, in whose house he was enslaved, say this to his wife.

  8. Note 8: Census figures for “Black and other races”, from Historical Statistics of the United States, Table Bc793–797, as summarised in NCES, 120 Years of American Education: A Statistical Portrait (1993), https://nces.ed.gov/naal/lit_history.asp. These are census self-reports under the old definition: unable to read or write in any language.

  9. Note 9: 52 U.S.C. § 10501, added by Pub. L. 91-285 (1970) and made permanent by Pub. L. 94-73 (1975), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52/10501; Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 U.S. 112 (1970); Lassiter v. Northampton County Board of Elections, 360 U.S. 45 (1959). The Voting Rights Act of 1965 suspended tests only in the jurisdictions it covered.

  10. Note 10: Hanushek, Schwerdt, Wiederhold and Woessmann, “Returns to skills around the world: Evidence from PIAAC”, European Economic Review 73 (2015): 103–130, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.10.006. The estimate is for numeracy, and it is an association, not a measured effect.

  11. Note 11: Evans, Kelley, Sikora and Treiman, “Family scholarly culture and educational success”, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 28(2) (2010): 171–197, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2010.01.002. Observational, after controls: books at home stand for a family’s reading culture.

  12. Note 12: Lusardi, Michaud and Mitchell, Journal of Political Economy 125(2) (2017): 431–477, https://doi.org/10.1086/690950. A life-cycle model of retirement wealth; it does not break inequality down by race.

  13. Note 13: Yakoboski, Lusardi and Hasler, Financial literacy and wellness among African-Americans, TIAA Institute and the Global Financial Literacy Excellence Center (about 2020), https://gflec.org/initiatives/financial-literacy-and-wellness-among-african-americans/. An industry-funded survey; it describes a gap in knowledge and does not show that the gap causes differences in wealth.

  14. Note 14: Darity, Hamilton, Paul, Aja, Price, Moore and Chiopris, What We Get Wrong About Closing the Racial Wealth Gap, Samuel DuBois Cook Center (Duke) and Insight Center, April 2018, https://samuelduboiscookcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/what-we-get-wrong.pdf. Data: Survey of Income and Program Participation, 2014.

  15. Note 15: Barsky, Bound, Charles and Lupton, Journal of the American Statistical Association 97(459) (2002): 663–673, https://doi.org/10.1198/016214502388618401. It decomposes the gap in mean wealth; it is not a test of financial literacy.

  16. Note 16: Linking Literature, linkingliterature.org: About Us, #LinkingLiterature1Million and Contact Us (pages first posted May 13, 2016); “Linking Literature: 1st Annual Youth Literature Collection” (August 4, 2015), “2nd Annual Youth Literature Collection” (July 20, 2016) and “3rd Annual Back-to-School Drive!” (October 5, 2017). The figures are the organisation’s own; we have not checked them.

© 2026 The Understanding Company

The Understanding Company is a financial technology company, not a bank. Accounts, balances, cards and money movement are provided through Whop and its financial partners. Balances are not FDIC insured.